Just a word to the wise that after I installed, hadn’t been running Endeavor for a while, all went well.
Then did the monumental update.
Rebooted and lo and behold ONLY Endeavor was listed.
Had to install os-prober andf add DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false.
I went on the Arch forum as well and complained to the effect, "What rocket scientist decided to remove OS-Prober.
I know Arch thinks is the Highlander, There can be only one, but the move was dumb.
Since Endeavor mirrors Arch I thought I’d post this.
Water under the bridge probably.
Anyway maybe the devs could look into it or not.
I think it makes sense that OS Prober was removed. I don’t dual boot, so having it is just a waste. If you do dual boot, then setup your system accordingly yourself.
And it’s now a security risk to have anything to do with Win10+ even in dual-boot, because of Windoze’s ability to access Linux file systems since WSL 2.
For the most part, it is… Dual-boot machines without windoze are the exception, not the norm. It is certainly not prevalent enough to be a reason to keep the OS Prober as a default.
In the broader world, you are almost definitely correct. Among the Linux enthusiasts who frequent this forum, I am not sure that is true…
To be 100% clear, I am not advocating that it should or shouldn’t be on by default. In fact, my preference would be that os-prober be disabled by default. That being said, I rarely use grub so I don’t really care much either way. I am also not one to get overly hung-up on defaults. As long as things like that are easy to change, set the default however and we can change it.
And you know it’s rare how?
I don’t get all this, “if I don’t use it then no one else should.”
I thought Linux was about freedom and we decide to do, not the Dev’s.
Gnome pulls the same crap.
Anyway, no need to respond anymore as I am now just gonna run Debian.
Umm…you still can decide. It was just a default that changed. Why is this even a big deal? If you want to use os-prober you still can. If you don’t, that is fine too. How can more choice than that be offered?