I am sorry to keep bothering you.
We know there is a bug with Baloo under BTRFS. It reindexes all my data, PDFs with every snapshot. So the laptop is always busy indexing files and index growing forever. Searching for a single unique file in Dolphin it returns several results of this single and unique file (multiple snapshots)
I am on KDE Plasma, Dolphin, Baloo.
I wonder if there is an indexed search tool that plays well with BTRFS? (preferably unde KDE Plasma).
P.S: I do not mind considering some other DE though I love Plasma. But I may consider LXQT, Gnome, MATE, XFCE, Cinnamon if I can do desktop search (preferably in the file manager) under BTRFS.
Why would you need indexed search in this day and age at all?
I don’t use Baloo and search is pretty damn fast without any index, regardless of filesystem…
For example, searching 3.6 TiB hdd drive full of music (583 115 files) for all .wav files recursively via dolphin’s search without any indexing takes about 12 seconds on my system.
Oh wait, indexed search means file contents?
I always thought it’s just mechanism to quickly search for files themselves by caching them in some db, which was useful on old hardware back in day…
But if you’re correct - then it’s whole another story.
Yes… unfortunately non indexed search is too slow.
I don’t mind a bit slow though.
What you recommend I try (from those in Dolphin… Kfind? Fsearch? they are not indexed… right?)
How many documents are we talking about and what formats are they in? Searching file contents without an index might be very slow without an index. Especially if you have a large number of PDFs requiring searching.
kfind is searching, not indexing. So if you try to do a content search on a large library it is essentially doing the same thing an indexer would do for each search.
I don’t think that is the intended use case for kfind.
AFAIK Baloo defaults to searching your home folder… This is configurable in KDE System Settings. If you have a folder like /home/$USER/snapshots you can exclude that folder or manually specify folders like ~/Desktop, ~/Downloads.
mmm… thinking… so probably it will work? How can we know?
OK… If I converted my disk to BTRFS, can I revert back to EXT4 in case needed?
I would better convert and revert rather than fresh install.
I can fresh install IFF (if and only if it is confirmed it will work)
Hopefully someone using BTRFS + Recoll (or any other) give us a clue.
Maybe someone with BTRFS might be interested to try Recoll and report back. Uninstall it if it didn’t work as expected!