28 Likes
28 Likes
I just shout JOOR - ZAH - FRUL
30 Likes
A somewhat spicy one:
Summary
12 Likes
exist also as markup script? 
2 Likes
Maybe not a meme, but still funny 
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Linux_April_Jokes#2013:_Pacman_depends_on_systemd
2013: Pacman depends on systemd
published: 2013 / permalink: Pacman 4.1 released
The major feature for the release is tight integration between the package manager and systemd. After much discussion about how best to perform updates on a rolling release system, we realized that it was essential to have updates preformed with minimal other processes running. Also, the security aspects of updates mean that it is essential that these get provided as soon as possible. We felt the best way to achieve this was to perform updates on shutdown. This is achieved through a new daemon, pacmand that monitors and downloads updates in the background. When updates are found, it schedules a reboot of the system (hence the need to integrate systemd). At the moment the timing of the reboots is not configurable, but a timer will pop-up to allow you to delay it for a preset amount of time. Configuration will likely be added in pacman-4.2, when pacmanctl will be ready for general use. Until that release is made, Arch Linux will minimize the impact by performing all updates in its [testing] repository and only push updates on a yet to be decided day and time of the week. A news post will be made when that is decided.
Of course, all this makes systemd a hard dependency of pacman. We felt this was acceptable given Arch Linux has officially switched to using systemd. As this release is not tested (and unlikely to work) on systems without systemd, Arch users or other distributions using pacman will be required to make the switch to systemd if they want to continue using pacman as their package manager. The integration with system will become tighter in pacman-4.2 where we plan to use the upcoming kdbus message passing interface – through libsystemd-bus – to allow other programs to interact with pacman, making the development of alternative front-ends easier.
9 Likes
That’s scary because it sounds plausible… and it might even give other distros ideas… 
7 Likes
No - that release was not informed by Windows experiences… much! 
2 Likes
38 Likes
40 Likes
23 Likes
Ok, i like it, when its funny, but i think this is a little bit to much 
2 Likes
18 Likes
@SGS… you wish 
funny tho 
4 Likes
11 Likes
21 Likes
The thing with Debian tho is that it’s not difficult because it is well… difficult. It’s just that it is very conservative to the point of making life difficult for the user that way.
Also, I really miss Suse in all of these. It is a brilliant distro and definitely deserves to be alongside Fedora.
4 Likes
25 Likes