Hey everyone. I switched (back) to Firefox mainly for the 2 following reasons:
1- Thought it I would have an easier time managing a browser that usually comes by default on most Linux distros, so since I thought of coming back to Linux full time, I thought this was sensible to do.
2- I didn’t want to keep using a Chromium based browser, if possible. (I used Edge before, for convenience and Msft shit aside, it was a good browser generally speaking).
I just got recommended this video about Mozilla and some shenanigans. - I could fact check everything just in case but to be honest, I don’t want to. Also don’t have that time and energy. So I thought it would be best to ask some people here that might be more up to date or follow those things closely. Are those things stated true?
There’s also this community post thread since a year and a half ago which I follow and have participated in so far about “tab grouping” feature being requested but not implemented and basically complete silence for a long long time from the dev team.
These things are kind of making me reconsider keep using Firefox at all because it feels it’s all for nothing. And I would dislike it because for example the mobile version for me works great, and my phone is a Galaxy A22, nothing really that powerful. I also use Ecosia as a search engine. I know their back end is basically Bing, but I made the decision trying to balance goals/values/action over convenience. I thought that basically using Bing isn’t great, but at the same time at least it’s a group of people caring for the environment. It was basically regular Bing that does nothing vs greener Bing (I’m not really an environmentalist I just thought it was a fair motivation to support).
In the light if this new information, if true, using Firefox is not a “fair inconvenience” for values or anything, it’s just an inconvenience. I could see someone making the argument of “Well, you are using Linux at the end of the day, inconveniences are our daily struggle!”. But on that note, say for example in the case of this distro, there’s a lot of great people willing to teach and help, and the team doing the work… you can kind of see it. And having an inconvenience with EndeavourOS, is what having an inconvenience on Linux is usually (but not always) like: gratifying. It’s one of those things where we always “get in trouble” and when we fix it just feels so good. But Firefox is not making me feel this way. However, I don’t really like Brave (in general) though I do use it for Netflix because of the 1080p extension that is not available for Firefox anymore, and I’m not really keen in using Edge again or things Microsoft related (unless made to by work or whatever if that ever happens). Vivaldi is not open source and is also a bit too much for my personal needs. The list runs dry. I don’t want to use Gnome Web/Epiphany or anything that doesn’t allow me to just “browse”. If I truly had to switch, I guess I would switch to Brave as it’s basically the only alternative in this case.
I want to keep using FF honestly, but the creator of the video said it best on a reply he posted to a comment: “I think that’s a good reason to use Firefox, but it’s hard to convince people to use a browser only as a protest against a monopoly.”.
What are your thoughts? Or maybe you have more information about all of this. I guess the one that hit me the most was the “they get 500m but also receive donations; none of them go towards Firefox”. Like what are they doing with those millions of dollars?