I found something relevant to xfce but seems to be a separate project.
my thinking also
Thatâll have eased your concerns, I imagine.
Haha yeah, it was my anxiety that made me dig up this article
Seeing that thereâs custom-licensed dependencies Iâm seeing for 1 of the 3 wayland packages so far, thatâs a concern. Is wayland involving more of the custom licensing? If so, will there be any distro to use that wonât be affected by wayland? yet is still usable with a graphics tablet?
@anon96036739
hmm, am lost as you are⌠not sure how licensing would be affected here.
Richard Stallman wonât be happy
Yes, I prefer to stick to the GPL to the max. This custom stuff makes me very uneasy, especially wrapped up in very IoT/web-friendly wayland. Plus, itâs no wonder the big applications etc donât get ported to Linux, when the sand shifts as it does, and more fracturing means more work for devs.
Is wayland involving more of the custom licensing?
If so, will there be any distro to use that wonât be affected by wayland?
Try xrandr
. If you get an output containing Xwayland
you are on wayland.
Screen 0: minimum 16 x 16, current 2560 x 1440, maximum 32767 x 32767
XWAYLAND0 connected 2560x1440+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 550mm x 310mm
2560x1440 59.91*+
Well, if you just want to know, if youâre running on Wayland or X, just check the appropriate environment variable:
echo $XDG_SESSION_TYPE
Being on gnome, you could also just check (gnome) settings -> info
. Look for the line that reads âwindow managerâ
All good - Thanks!
If there are no serious problems with GNOME, I will sit back and enjoy the further development
i find it big they say zero development to Wayland⌠for that they have to transform to GTK3 , and a part of the xfce users are mayby also not happy to the transformation to csdâŚthats a step towarts wayland basicly⌠and they do it now with smaller steps and hopefully they can atract more developers on the way =-)
sure they say Xorg is abonnen ware but a jump to wayland will abon also lot of softwareâŚ; dont think average linux happy with it if had linux software ecology is death
major distroâs are pushing wayland for development they working on it but stil need time. edge and stability is not the same
currently wayland runs on xorg as a layer above⌠and another layer xwayland over that for xorg based programmes
These articles showed up four years ago also, saying Xorg is outdated and a mess, somehow four years later, the main DEs and distros didnât switch entirely to Wayland, so to call Xorg abandonware is still a personal point of view and not entirely based on solid facts.
Wayland has come a long way, but it still has a long way in front of it to be called the golden standard in Linux. (My point of view, ofcourseâŚ
)
I heard of security issues in the Xorg display servers compared to Wayland. I found this article that explains it.
Personal, current wayland has no different security issueâŚbut thats a opinion, unless wayland goes 100,% xorg free
But that article is from 2018, and kernel/browser security fixes happen, so if xorg was that bad, it would have received fixes too. Wayland is more IoT-focussed, which could be a reason why itâs being pushed more.
If this is about IoT then iâd rather use pen & paper instead
No thx, Skynet