Yes, I did wonder, as Wayland isn’t very developed or stable yet, as far as I understand. They seem to bring in bits of Wayland though, as I’ve noticed a wayland file being installed during updates, on Mate … on checking, it’s wayland, wayland-protocols, and lib32-wayland. One of the dependencies is wpebackend-fdo; backend for WPE webkit … custom license, not GPL. This is what I’m nervous of about Wayland … too much IoT focus, and the same rushing to bring it in asap, whether users want it or not.
From the wpewebkit.org site:
WPE powers hundreds of millions of embedded devices.
Embedded “browsers” are more than just a way that people can browse the Web as we commonly think about them: They power increasingly many of the user interfaces that you encounter every day. From cable boxes to automobile and airplane infotainment systems, to kiosks, digital signage, smart appliances and video game consoles—embedded browsers are everywhere.
I can’t even put into words how against smart devices, IoT, and things running via the browser, I am, plus I doubt opening up everyone’s systems and devices to run in these ways is going to be more secure, which seems to be the excuse used for rushing Wayland through. At least monthly there seems to be a big data breach, and always more pushing to data-mine, plus subscriptions, or forced sign-ups, e.g. MS bringing in that minecraft players must have an MS account to be able to play next year.
inxi -G
Graphics: Device-1: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] Navi 10 [Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 XT]
driver: amdgpu v: kernel
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.9 driver: ati,modesetting unloaded: fbdev,radeon resolution:
1: 1920x1080~60Hz 2: 1920x1080~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (NAVI10 DRM 3.39.0 5.9.1-arch1-1 LLVM 10.0.1)
v: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1
Thankfully running x11, phew. Hadn’t even thought to check, with being on Mate + I’ve not seen Arch saying anything about Wayland.