That might be true, yes, a lot of stuff with Wayland is broken on KDE. But I doubt all my problems with Wayland are specific to KDE.
For example, I want to have a window that is not focused be able to poll for global coordinates of the mouse cursor – an elementary and pretty common task, you would think, right? Impossible on Wayland. And I really need my Xeyes!
Or, I want to save my global clipboard history or use the clipboard to share data between applications… Or, I want one program to register key presses in another program and react to them… Wayland just makes it so difficult, if not impossible. These are elementary features that I would expect from any desktop – a lot of my daily workflow depends on them. Screen recording? Remote desktop? Such a pain on Wayland. Have a 10 pixel gap between monitors? Nope, your mouse gets locked on one screen!
Also, the performance being better on Wayland is mostly a myth. Many games work better on Xorg if I turn off compositing. On Wayland I can’t do that.
Sure, but ɢɴᴏᴍᴇ sucks, that’s hardly a selling point for Wayland. If I wanted to use a crappy version of MacOS, I’d use MacOS.
Sway, on the other hand, is pretty nice, I wouldn’t mind using that.
When it comes to web browsers, my philosophy is that the purpose of a web browser is to display hypertext. It’s not a media player, and I do not use it as such. In fact, my browser is so hardened, it won’t play any video or audio whatsoever. If I want to watch a YouTube video, I download it and watch it in my media player of choice. The experience is much better, because the online player YouTube uses is just awful, I think the kids in the special needs class could program a better media player than the engineers at Goolag.