Minisforum v3 with hyprland and waybar.
With bspwm for me it was hard as hell becuase the half dozen packages I had to install and configure personally (sway, pi, 4 more etc) and half-write their whole config files…I admire this KISS here.
I thought I was the only one that hunted the hobby obscure .I am nursing a deb cutout called FunOS that looks NOWHERE as imaginative as Lilidog. Nice.
tell me about the dock
.thanks!
what a magnificent thread, all of you
love it
Here is my desktop. I use some scripts and conkies.
LEFT SIDE
- Gis-weather shows the weather right over my head.
- AstroNerd conky shows solar activity in real time, 5 clothest to Earth asteroids with sizes and distances, and Moon phases.
CENTER - The image of Earth changes automatically each 15 minutes and shows images from GOES16 satellite. The image is composed over the picture of the starry sky.
RIGHT SIDE - AutomatiK conky shows the system parameters, and photo frame widget at the bottom right shows any images I want.
Lowe hyprland
… Nice … almoust every easy install dots have ZSH …
… bloatware for system youst from start
… No i understand why … fish is better ![]()
badass setup what de are you using?
i have no idea how to use hyperland but your shit is wicked maybe i should investigate or explore it when i got time idk it looks cool asf though
I didn’t understand you.
I’m using KDE Plasma 6.1.5
Gis-Weather. Better use version 0.8.4.1 (works smooth)
AstroNerd Conky
Goes16-background (it hangs over South America, USA visible partly)
OR
HIMAWARIPY (it hangs over Australia, nothing special to see)
AutomatiK conky
Just asking, what does fish do better than bash or zsh?
Everything !! ![]()
More easy … hints and others . And over zsh or bash you dont need lots of pluigins or complicated config (over zsh) , ewerything youst works :-). How it should.
I have no experience with customizing the fish shell but you can make bash and zsh as complicated as you want so I would assume the same goes for the fish shell. As an example the examples on the Archwiki page for the fish shell look way more complicated than my zsh config, also you only have write your shell config once and then can use it in a new install and add things to it as you like so it’s not like you start from scratch every time.
I do think the official documentation for the fish shell looks way better than the official documentation for the zsh. People that are used to a POSIX shell might not like going to something that is none-POSIX shell but I think it’s a plus for fish’s documentation that they made a section for bash users to show the differences.
Yes but for zsh to get it like fish , you nedd oh my zsh … for bas somthing too. Fish is exelent … it works , it has 6 predefined config that are great and … nothing need to be write by hand (web interface fish-config)
And yes … i have start with zsh … but nevew got the config how i wanted it to work
… and fish works how i want no need to config ![]()












