I used to distro hop a lot. I have used all major distros leaving two.
Gentoo & Slackware.
What about you ?
Those of you who have used both Gentoo & Arch please tell if you have found any major difference between the two. Both follow a similar approach of being bleeding edge so I am curious. What are the differences ?
I haven’t used most of them. It’s far easier to list the ones I have used:
Buntu (not using any more)
Debian (not on desktop)
Arch
Manjaro (not using any more)
EndeavourOS
Fedora (just tried it out for a couple of hours, this is my backup if I can’t use Arch any more)
Garuda (just tried it out for a couple of hours)
I haven’t used any other Linux distro. I’m interested in trying out Gentoo, but I’ll wait until I’m retired, so I have the time to compile everything
Besides, I don’t even like Linux, but I have to use something until GNU Hurd becomes a viable option, and of all the options currently on the table, Linux is the one that sucks the least. It still sucks, though.
I’ve never even tried to use Ubuntu and diverse *buntus. Went to Mint directly and after a couple days was saved by my guru who abducted and forced me on Manjaro. The rest is history.
Tested but not used: Fedora, Mageia, AntiX, diverse Puppies, Solus, Zorin, PCLos, Lite, Q4OS, Gecko, Makulu, Kylin …
Failed to install Suse, Debian proper, Siduction, Red Hat, vanilla Arch, RHEL, Oracle … many others.
I noticed a number of people have listed slackware as a major distro they haven’t used.
Do we still consider slackware a major distro?
When I first started with linux slackware was one of the largest(if not the largest) linux distros at the time. These days it feels like more of a niche distro.
Given the last “stable” version was realeased 5 years ago, and there doesn’t appear to be anything that Slack brings to the table to interest an archer…probably not?