https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/prepros-bin
Maintainer just updated …
just checked and the change is fixing the package…
Great, now works as it should. Thanx to all for your help.
2 Likes
you are welcome 
Even though you got it running, yes, it’s better to look for an alternative. 
It’s just awful…
Prepros can compile Sass, Less, Stylus, Pug/Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript and TypeScript
Yeah, you shouldn’t be using any of these “technologies” to develop for web. They are what makes the web as terrible as it is.
Also:
Seriously, for a text editor? Which you intend to run on Linux, the operating system that has at least 10 million text editors written for… It’s almost as outrageous as using buttons with rounded edges in the current year.
1 Like
It’s always good to know alternatives 
I can’t imagine going back to pure CSS once you work with SASS, yes compiled code is not optimal but it speeds up the development. I don’t agree that those technologies makes web terrible. What makes web terible are the bad developers who don’t know how to use those technologies properly.
And about prepros, prepros is not a text editor
It speeds up web development, but slows down web use. It’s soyftware.
This is the ideal web: https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ (Warning: NSFW language)
More importantly, you can use any css / js preprocessor without proprietary software.
1 Like
…but you shouldn’t.
Almost ideal, it has this filth in it:
Fortunately, my browser blocks this.
The only thing I can say to that is: enjoy your Goolag pennies and SEO brownie points while you can, you won’t be able to bring them along when you go to hell.
Noooooooo waaaaaay
DIRTY TrAITORS!!!
1 Like
Yes, absolute sellouts.
and there i was thinking we could silently have a conversation with propritary software involved 
1 Like
Not much of a conversation if we are silent…
This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.