there are some stuff I like about ubuntu budgie desktop, which is hard to setup the same on arch linux versions, or other linux distros
solus doesn’t get grub or the boot loader working with 4.3 I tried them on my hardware I had problems getting solus to install the bootloader for dual booting, no problems with ubuntu budgie, I have tried budgie on this arch based version it just doesn’t look or work the same, seems to be missing the tray icon bar from the bottom of the screen they seem to be setup different, also I tried Garuda Linux besides Endeavouros, I didn’t like the color pick of its gaming iso kde desktop from Garuda, its color pattern is just not exactly for me.
website links
Garuda KDE Dr460nized
is solus website
https://getsol.us/
Ubuntu Budgie 21.10
the Garuda KDE Dr460nized share the same type of desktop bar or icons for launching apps as ubuntu budgie, but on arch when install budgie it doesn’t seem to have that same setup or bar launcher in the center of the screen at the bottom I forgot the name of it, at this time.
also solus is a Linux distribution built from scratch but how is it different than the ones put together in either ubuntu or arch based linux? how exactly is solus different in design from any other linux? I don’t really understand if its better or less better than ubuntu or arch linux, were not all linux distro’s made from scratch at one point or another? to me kde and gnome in each linux looks a little different but seem to run the same , the only thing I really noticed is the difference in the package systems they use.
Garuda KDE Dr460nized look, the tray on the bottom center is what I liked and Iaicer or something like that app is called?
ubuntu budgie desktop look that arch doesn’t seem to have for budgie