The results can be different for others since settings as well as the number of extensions, specific extensions you have, and whether Javascript is enabled or not, and window size, pl;us others, can affect the fingerprint. This also means that if you enable JavaScript for an individual website then the fingerprint is likely exposed to that site as more unique.
I am only mentioning this just to explain a possible reason why different people get different results with the same browsers in this chart.
Randomised fingerprints can, in some ways, make you more unique, such as logging in to website accounts because those companies know your account details and know you use a randomised fingerprint which not many users have, or when a randomised fingerprint is combined with other static data like cookies and public IP, or the account is logged on via mobile phone app, etc tracking can still be linked. So best to use randomised with a VPN in terms of the public IP linking.
Here is What I tested for Librewolf.
My Mullvad browser with ublock origin disabling JavaScript by default, it stays protected regardless of window size changes. If Javascript is not disabled then resizing the Mullvad window will change to a status of unique fingerprint.
This is the Tor browser. This one stays protected regardless of window size (and if no extensions are added) but I have it’s protection set to safest and everything is set to default other than using a snowflake proxy.
I don’t use Chromium based browsers (Other than Freetube technically being a chromium browser) so I don’t have any comment on them in terms of tracking protections or anything like that.