Hello @essegi
You said you did the automatic installation? It looks like you are using the online installer to install Mate desktop. How did you select the partitioning setup? Erase disc with swap? or other? Looks like your laptop is Intel Graphics HD 5500. Shouldnât be any issue to install from what i see. If your laptop has UEFI you need to disable secure boot and fast boot in UEFI before attempting to install.
Hi again Guys, I couldnât answer yesterday since I reached the maximum of posts for a new member (?!). Anyway, I have much appreciated help and support.
Update: After more than 12 hours the installation process failed
here the pastebin http://ix.io/2d98
Let me recapitulate:
I would like to try a proper install (not live usb with persistence) on usb target drive
Installation method: online with mate (but I tried also the offline method.
live usb created with rufus and etcher portable on win10 and etcher on Manjaro
target usb: kingston or sandisk, new or semi-new, 16Gb and 32Gb
I tried, say, 10 times the installation with no success. By the way, thank you @Halcek for the guide, it is useful, however a little bit aged. Also, I did not check the option to encrypt the disk in Calamares.
One main issue was until now that I downloaded the iso via Win10 and Alpix mirror. Then I tried via Manjaro (installed on usb in half an our with the same method) and Github mirror. I could verify the isos and discover that the ones downloaded from Alpix were corrupted. From Github it was ok and apparently, the installation was going on, but it failed when it reached probably the 70% of the process. I wonder if it is normal so much time. I donât have many options left. I will try what @SGS suggested, i.e. downloading a beta functioning iso
Any further suggestion would be much appreciated
Thanks a lot
The process described should be pretty similar with Endeavour. From what I gather, you essentially need two USB drives plugged in at the same time: one with the live ISO on it, and the other you need to format with GPARTED to install on.
I suppose the first step will be changing the booting from BIOS/UEFI onto that USB stick, which has the live ISO on it. Then wipe the second USB drive and use the installer to manually divide the blank USB between a Home (data) partition (ext4) and swap. Just select the ext4 home partition of your USB for installation then, and donât use encryption.
Manjaro has a tutorial / guide. One would have to figure out what they have changed command wise from arch (they have some of their own commands) and convert it to arch proper for EndeavourOS. You seem very proficient and there are plenty of helpers here so maybe try that?
In the meanwhile I made various attempt to install arch with archifi and manjaro architect. The installation failed, but I noticed something interesting which reminded me of the failed installation of endeavour os. Archfi and manjaro architect failed around the 60-70% of the process, i.d. with installation of the bootloader, which refers to the partioning of the drive. More or less it was similar to the failure with endeavour. Now, I was curious to check the partion method of the two working manjaro pendrive that I have made.
Both are gpt, sdc1 fat32 boot/efi (flag, boot, esp) and sdc2 ext4 â/â. I donât remember well, but I think I made them with Calamares automatic partitioning, which in Endeavour os failed.
Now, I was wondering if I could try again to install endeavour os with a manual mode.
I have a notebook in legacy boot. I donât need a dual boot, since I will install endeavour on a usb as a portable system. So I was wondering if a msdos partition table with one only sdc1 partition ext4 â/â flag boot could make sense. Any suggestion are welcome.
Thanks a lot
usb created with etcher, according to eos wiki (but I tried also with rufus)
Secure boot disable since I work in legacy mode
I let Calamares do the job with automatic partitioning, but perhaps - I donât remember yet - I tried also the manual partitioning. Calamares automatic uses Uefi (gpt, sdc1 fat32, sdc2 ext4) and I wonder if I could try now a manual Bios legacy install (mbr, ext4 boot; correct?)
I donât think that my notebook travelmate has Optane memory. I posted the specs
About Alpix: I could not verify from Win10 with utilities such as md5 and winmd5, since I could not file a valid md5 value. I had to download the iso again via manjaro and I could verify that it was corrupted according to the this message
md5sum -c endeavouros-2019.12.22-x86_64.iso.md5sum
endeavouros-2019.12.22-x86_64.iso: FAILED
md5sum: ATTENTION: 1 calculated control code does NOT match
Maybe you could tell me more about a mbr install in legacy mode, since the Uefi failed
Thank you very much
UEFI vs. BIOS install: it is best (and by far the easiest) to install according to your machine specs, and what you already have installed on your machine. So if you already have all gpt disks and other operating systems are installed in UEFI mode, then use UEFI.
And if your machine allows to select either UEFI or BIOS/MBR install, Iâd recommend UEFI because it is newer technology.
BIOS/MBR install can be done if your machine (firmware/BIOS) supports it. Then if you have other operating systems, you may have to re-install them as well. And all disks preferably should be MBR disks to avoid some issues.
So I donât recommend BIOS legacy install.
Thatâs why some (failure) logs and other info from your machine is needed, e.g.
lsblk -fm
sudo fdisk -l
inxi -Fxc0 # if you have inxi installed
Hi Manuel,
thank you for your reply, quite clear
Here my failure log http://ix.io/2d98
As for the machine: it supports well legacy boot, which I use with different debian based distros on usb, and also manjaro. I have seen some video of arch installation in legacy mode, and it should be ok also for eos. I would like to try thisopportunity since every attempt to install with calamares (gpt table, fat32 boot/efi and ext4 root /) has failed. Is it correct msdos partition table, one ext4 partition (boot), maybe swap for legacy boot?
Skimming the log through didnât show the reason for me, other than it is taking very much time. Is that the case also when you install other distros to the stick?
Maybe @fernandomaroto could see better what the problem with the install is?
Basically you should be able to install EOS into a USB stick (I guess either one of UEFI or BIOS/MBR mode), but some people have said it to be very challenging. I havenât done that, so unfortunately I cannot help much with that.
Hi!
One thing that comes to mind checking the log is time out value for running cleaner_script (this aply if the install is slow for some reason, writing to usb may be the case)
07:46:27 [0]: QProcess: Destroyed while process ("env") is still running.
You can try before lauching calamares to manually change timeout from cleaner script, open a terminal and type sudo sed -i s'/480/4800/' /usr/share/calamares/modules/shellprocess.conf
This will change the âwaitâ time from 8 minutes to 80, itâs crazy but worth checking.
The error log is not clear enough if failed at cleaner_script step or something right after itâŚ
OBS:
Use gparted to create partitions as you want - specially partition table, avoid using autopartitioning for the december iso.
No, it does not take so much time. I installed on usb mx linux, ubuntu mate, peppermint os. With a couple of hours I was done. Manjaro took a little bit longer, say three-four hours, but nothing to compare with eos, which requested 12 hours and reached around 70% of installation, and eventually failed.
Actually, it is quite challenging, but I donât give up easily. I will try what @fernandomaroto kindly suggested. Thank you very much. I appreciate that