In the company where I worked then, there was one machine running Os/2 with software that was rather crucial - and hardly anyone knew anything about OS/2. It was a disaster waiting to happen. So I ported the software to a Windows PC (which would have been either 3.11 or 95 I think; not sure anymore.)
Myself i can’t believe it’s only been 30 years
It’d be interesting to look at, but I doubt most software I would be interested would run on it.
Are there even 3rd party browsers for OS/2?
It’s proprietary. And won’t support 64bit, its a 32bit kernel completely. A personal license would be $139.00, I guess most user nowadays won’t even consider to use it on their 64bit architectures.
I’m pretty certain that their nice is legacy hardware / software that has been developed in the past for OS/2 and some enthusiasts.
It’s a proprietary dinosaur from thirty years back, which was supposed to become a DOS alternative, but due to different opinions of IBM and Microsoft about the right course, never really took off.
Being a dinosaur myself I have worked with it, and I was happy to have an alternative to windows.
Way back then, it was better than Windows, but it never really took off (here in the States at least) and remained a very small niche.
Course being better than early Windows, wasn’t a very high bar….
It was little more compilcated. OS/2 was develop with IBM and Microsoft. But they have litle diferent ideas. After sucess of first version of windows .Microsoft “steal” = “take of with his writen part + some extrass “ from base of OS/2 and remade it and release Windows NT. So OS/2 on moder PC lives even in modern windows → if they already dit not replace this part with steal from linux
You wont be disappointed. It’s an objective analysis on Gates MS timeliness, without overtly criticizing Gates. We all know how & why Gates advanced cheating, monopoly practices (nevermind inferior software quality), but ***how*** he tried to stamp out competition is a completely different perspective.