Totally confused by this. Two almost identical systems. when running yay, an app called system-monitoring-center tries to upgrade to version 2.6.0-3, works fine on one and not on the other. The error I’m getting on the fail is:
:: 1 Packages to upgrade.
1 aur/system-monitoring-center 2.5.0-1 → 2.6.0-3
==> Packages to exclude: (eg: “1 2 3”, “1-3”, “^4” or repo name)
==>
:: Checking for conflicts…
:: Checking for inner conflicts…
[Aur:1] system-monitoring-center-2.6.0-3
1 system-monitoring-center (Installed) (Build Files Exist)
==> Packages to cleanBuild?
==> [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]tInstalled or (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4)
==>
:: PKGBUILD up to date, Skipping (1/0): system-monitoring-center
1 system-monitoring-center (Installed) (Build Files Exist)
==> Diffs to show?
==> [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]tInstalled or (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4)
==>
:: (1/1) Parsing SRCINFO: system-monitoring-center
==> Making package: system-monitoring-center 2.6.0-3 (Wed 01 Feb 2023 10:02:20 AM CST)
==> Retrieving sources…
→ Found system-monitoring-center-2.6.0.tar.gz
==> Validating source files with sha256sums…
system-monitoring-center-2.6.0.tar.gz … FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
→ error downloading sources: system-monitoring-center
context: exit status 1
==> Making package: system-monitoring-center 2.6.0-3 (Wed 01 Feb 2023 10:02:20 AM CST)
==> Checking runtime dependencies…
==> Checking buildtime dependencies…
==> Retrieving sources…
→ Found system-monitoring-center-2.6.0.tar.gz
==> Validating source files with sha256sums…
system-monitoring-center-2.6.0.tar.gz … FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
→ error making: system-monitoring-center
[mark@mark-optiplex9020 ~]$
I understand what the checksum fail means, but how could it fail on one machine and not the other?
Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.