eosbtw
March 16, 2022, 2:12pm
1
pacman -Qi ranger
lists atool
as an optional dep “for previews of archives”.
I installed atool
on 2022-01-31 using pacman -S
:
$ grep atool /var/log/pacman.log
[2022-01-31T19:25:19+0530] [PACMAN] Running 'pacman -S atool'
[2022-01-31T19:25:25+0530] [ALPM] installed atool (0.39.0-7)
$
but recently I installed EOS on another machine and found that atool
isn’t in the regular repos any more but in the AUR.
Is there a Arch page that documents removal of packages?
Hm. That’s definitely a packaging bug.
Reported, https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/74141
3 Likes
No idea about any database of removed packages, but the AUR page for atool does tell that its a recent addition.
First Submitted: 2022-02-05 18:15 (UTC)
Also, the wiki seems to be recently updated to change link of atool from repo to AUR.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Ranger&type=revision&diff=716585&oldid=715081
2 Likes
It has been dropped from the standard arch repos to the AUR.
committed 06:12PM - 05 Feb 22 UTC
dropped to AUR
git-svn-id: file:///srv/repos/svn-community/svn@1126482 9fca08f… 4-af9d-4005-b8df-a31f2cc04f65
3 Likes
eosbtw
March 16, 2022, 2:32pm
5
The bug you linked to has the reason .
I’m guessing it’s better to learn to do without it.
1 Like
eosbtw
March 17, 2022, 2:03am
7
Your bug report has a comment pointing to this bug and quoting from the latter bug:
Description:
atool uses hardcoded permission when creating new directories. This introduces problems for use-cases of multiple users on a system trying to handle files on shared volumes.
Additional info:
Does that suffice?
It was supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek comment because the bug report just includes information that was already in this thread.
2 Likes