To me gnome makes sense if you use touchpad gestures or key bindings. Using the keyboard, the workflow is not really that different than let’s say i3wm. The only extension needed is tiling. The rest is bloat and gets in the way for getting stuff done. Some people don’t like it, that’s ok. But gnome has the best implementation for multiscreen and high dpi scaling and Wayland. KDE does many things well but not those things. At least not my experience. Gnome is probably awful for someone using a desktop computer and likes mouse and floating windows.
I am still to try gnome 42. Since I don’t change much themes, the major area of complaint should be ok for me. I generally don’t have a good experience when using themes out of the standard themes. Even with kde.
The extension thing, not sure if it’s good or bad, at least there options.
Right now I have a computer with gnome for work using pop OS. I think there is one called pop shell.
It’s in the AUR or can be built from source for using the pop keybindings.
Edit: the only tweak I do is custom keyboard shortcuts in gnome settings, I use meta+1, meta+2 to move focus to workspace 1, 2 etc. And meta+shift+1 to move my selected window to workspace 1, 2, etc…
Edit2: it’s possible to also possible to stack windows in tabbed mode. meta+enter, meta+S, move two windows on top of each other…
Sorry guys, I ask myself all the time since I read along here: Why and what is the point of this whole discussion? Is it to end up with a single opinion and position on GNOME? Every user has different requirements for his DE. Can not you just leave it at that? I don’t like it and don’t use it, others love it … well, done, out …