I’d absolutely be honored to have it as a CE for EndeavourOS. I’ve opened this thread for discussion of this planned CE, which I hope to start with today. Here are some components I am thinking of right now:
menu / launcher: rofi
file manager: pcmanfm or thunar
I hope we can get it done in time for the next release!
I’m a Gnome user myself, but I’m fond of plenty of other desktop environments as well. I know there is a plethora of DE’s out there and no shortage of window managers for that matter either. With that said, I think as long as you have feature-parity with other similar window managers you’re off to a good start. As long as you are able to stand out of the pack in a different and meaningful way from other window managers and are also able to maintain and update your window manager accordingly (fixing bugs, adding requested features, improving code, etc), I think your WormWM could be a worthy addition to consider in the future. For some of that though it’s too early to tell and your WM is still very new, but nonetheless I’ve followed your progress so far and you are off to a really good start.
My only concern is your first attempt, the code got abandoned rather quickly, so I could see some hesitance there in adoption, but I’m sure there were logical reasons for that. As long as you can guarantee to a certain degree that it will be actively developed and maintained, I could easily see quite a few window manager users being quite happy with your WormWM. I’m not a WM type of user myself, but regardless of my environment of choice, I fully hope you succeed in your undertaking. Just keep at it, be aware of burn out, seek help whenever you need it, and always remember why you started it in the first place so you never truly lose sight of your goals.
There were, and I don’t plan for it to happen again; it was basically a “first try” at writing something decent that other people could use, and the codebase grew to be pretty crappy eventually over time so I decided to rewrite it with my new experience. I do plan to maintain it, as I’m using it every day as a daily driver.
I think it’s important that while this is a community edition, it’s also a gift to the community. So, you should also make it some how you want it as well with consideration from the community.
I personally like both pcmanfm and thunar. . . if I had to choose for a wm - I prefer pcmanfm though. Why? I dunno. I always feel like Thunar makes it more “taken from xfce” than “supposed to be in worm” . . .
I’ll have a look to update the PKGBUILD for the AUR package.
Could you add a license as well?
I have some issue building it though
Verifying dependencies for firstname.lastname@example.org
Prompt: No local packages.json found, download it from internet? [y/N]
Downloading Official package list
Success Package list downloaded.
Installing x11@any version
Downloading https://github.com/nim-lang/x11 using git
Verifying dependencies for email@example.com
Success: x11 installed successfully.
Building worm/wormc using c backend
Building worm/worm using c backend
/firstname.lastname@example.org: In function ‘getProperty__9aiI5srh3lf4yinTF7HA9aGQ’:
/email@example.com:3022:26: error: incompatible types when assigning to type ‘tyObject_Option__hcmjwL9c5ECYpHnVevXHwEQ’ from type ‘tyObject_Option__9bcZreTqxpOXg5u4xcKsUEw’
3022 | result = colontmpD__2;
/firstname.lastname@example.org: In function ‘handleUnmapNotify__IBNx9c2pqwde9cI9bE9afvcRpw’:
/email@example.com:4423:27: error: incompatible types when assigning to type ‘tyObject_Option__hcmjwL9c5ECYpHnVevXHwEQ’ from type ‘tyObject_Option__9bcZreTqxpOXg5u4xcKsUEw’
4423 | (*self).focused = T12_;
/firstname.lastname@example.org: In function ‘handleDestroyNotify__UtpRh9a9bdEb3vV3vfdWHAsw’:
/email@example.com:4509:27: error: incompatible types when assigning to type ‘tyObject_Option__hcmjwL9c5ECYpHnVevXHwEQ’ from type ‘tyObject_Option__9bcZreTqxpOXg5u4xcKsUEw’
4509 | (*self).focused = T12_;
Error: execution of an external compiler program 'gcc -c -w -fmax-errors=3 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fno-plt -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-ident -I/usr/lib/nim -I/home/moson/build/worm/src -o /firstname.lastname@example.org /email@example.com' failed with exit code: 1
Tip: 35 messages have been suppressed, use --verbose to show them.
Error: Build failed for package: worm
... Execution failed with exit code 1
... Command: /usr/bin/nim c --colors:on --noNimblePath -d:release --gc:arc -d:NimblePkgVersion=0.1.0 --path:/home/moson/.nimble/pkgs/x11-1.1 --hints:off -o:/home/moson/build/worm/worm /home/moson/build/worm/src/worm.nim
I’ve installed nim (1.4.8-1) and nimble (1:0.13.1-1) from the Arch repo’s…
It seems to need at least Nim 1.6.0 to build successfully.
I have a working PKGBUILD for it which makes use of “choosenim” AUR package.
I’ll probably update it later on the AUR. To be discussed (in the other worm specific thread I’d say) → Can it be made compatible with 1.4.8 instead maybe. Or offer a “worm-bin” package with pre-compiled binaries…
This be my biggest concern tbh. I’ve got more abandoned projects than I can count - and sometimes I’ve regretted making a show when I start a project, only to disappoint people when I abandon it.
I’m not questioning your capability ofc, but these two things for sure I’ll expect if Worm WM gets into EnOS:
Regular bug fixes and feature additions. Worm is ofc new so there must be many features missing. And for every line of code humans write, they introduce, on average, seven bugs. Need to be taken care of xD
Maintaining the WM as @Scotty_Trees said. Even if you reach a point where you’re satisfied with Worm and declare it “feature-complete”, you probably need to look over the project to see if stuff needs to be updated because one of the libraries you depend on has deprecated certain features, etc. (or pass on the responsibility to someone else)
Kinda ironical this is coming from a person whose ratio of completed to abandoned projects is about 1:40, but you get the idea.
I bet you will. You work while I chat.
Edit : When is the Assembly rewrite of Worm coming out?
It won’t ordinarily. For it to work the package would have to be added to the EndeavourOS repository and maintained. It has been done before for example inxi but it’s up to the guys like joe Manuel and Bryan as to whether or not it happens.
PS. Installing from AUR straight in Calamares will get messy, and someone - most probably Joe and Manuel - will have to maintain that. Could get decent amount of extra work, which I’m personally not in favor of.