I installed yay -S clamav, then I installed yay -S clamtk (cronie version), then before starting it I ran sudo freshclam, and then I started clamtk from the start menu.
The problem is that when you click UPDATE or try to scan a file or directory, clamtk stuck closes.
I don’t know if I skipped any steps or did something wrong.
Yeah ClamTK don’t work, you can’t update with it.
I’ve gave up on it and just run ClamAV in terminal.
KDE 6 and driver have nothing to do with it ClamTK is just broken.
I’m using Cinnamon, I’ve got a AMD video card. I’m using Clamtk which I ran just for the fun of it this morning. I’ve got 6 windows program files on my computer which I run through ‘Wine’. I also have them stored in my home directory in a folder named ‘Software’.
Clamtk: version 6.14
clamav: 1.21
Antivirus Signatures as of today : 27,232 loaded
Here’s what I came up with scanning my ‘Home’ directory after checking all under :‘Settings’.
files scanned: 56,272
possible threats: 11
I did analysis of all 11 threats and nothing came up as suspicious.
It works fine and does not lock up. . . maybe your issues somehow conflict. Try removing everything and re-installing and running just Clamtk.
Just out of curiosity, what is your use case for clamav/clamtk?
Do you run a file/mail server? Do you often share files with Windows?
To my understanding, ClamAV is not an antivirus solution for Linux systems.
Clam AntiVirus is an open source (GPL) anti-virus toolkit for UNIX. It provides a number of utilities including a flexible and scalable multi-threaded daemon, a command line scanner and advanced tool for automatic database updates. Because ClamAV’s main use is on file/mail servers for Windows desktops, it primarily detects Windows viruses and malware with its built-in signatures.
Clam is utterly useless, in my opinion. Why would I waste even a single CPU cycle trying to protect some windoze system from malware, especially given the fact that windoze itself is malware?
All windoze antivirus software is pointless, when you think about it, but one that runs on Linux doubly so. If windoze users cared about malware, they’d be using a different operating system, one that is not malware itself.
There are signatures for Linux malware you can add. I also don’t think it’s useful, though. The router firewall, some adblock and browsing respeonsibly should negate any threats that could get you on Linux.
clam av was born to be messy and I don’t like to hassle with it and there are two better, undersung, programs: maldetect lynis
to be honest, I don’t know how those two (or any AV) react positively/negatively with Wayland. It would be interesting if it was a trend but I haven’t read a thing.
food fer thought, and good luck