My ‘knowledge’ comes from following the topic on Garuda - and it certainly appears to be using custom lockdown strategies and user.js etc - but check with those more knowledgable, please! (or for yourself, of course).
What’s the value of that for instance?
extensions.getAddons.langpacks.url
current upstream is = Firefox:
https://services.addons.mozilla.org/api/v4/addons/language-tools/?app=firefox&type=language&appversion=%VERSION%
Judging from that it should be more or less upstream LibreWolf with some quality of life changes, but i’ll need to dig deeper later when more time arises 
@keybreak un-googled chromium would be a better option now? 
I don’t know, personally i still prefer Firefox based even if it means self-maintain
1 Like
I agree. If the FF ever breaks away, I might take a look at Vivaldi. But that will surely take a few more months …
1 Like
I like Vivaldi but it’s a little too much. I stick with Firefox as it has the basics i want.
1 Like
I’m just more and more pissed off by the behavior of Mozilla … the left-green attitude just has no place there. Otherwise … yep, as long as he is still there …
3 Likes
I still think Firefox is the best all around browser for my everyday use.
2 Likes
If you are looking for a right-brown (or any other color combination of your choice) browser, I think you can leave Firefox at any moment and find an alternative. Don’t you think so?
I don’t think this comment has “no place here”, politicizing unnecessarily a thread whis is about privacy browsers.
6 Likes
I think any sane person in our 
day and age is looking for NO political leaning and color combination in OS / software and especially browser, just as with smartphone, kettle, fridge, car, toilet paper and even tin-foil… 
It’s getting extremely hard to do this days, unless you really up for a task of doing some tin-hat-foilery on your own though
6 Likes
Well either there are no sane persons in this world, or that kind of sanity is just wishful thinking .
Even the air we breath, the water we drink, the food we eat, the most basic thing for a human beings subsistence are “colored” by politics.
If you are looking for anything non-political you have my best wishes!
With that said, I am not going to continue discussing this, since it will politicize
5 Likes
Like a frontal lobectomy?
1 Like
Unfortunately, they politicize themselves.
From whose perspective?
They are perfectly entitled and free as any other organization to adhere to any political creed they want. They don’t have to abide by my political preferences or anyone else’s. That’s their call.
If I don’t like their product, for which I am not paying a single penny, I would leave it. I happen to like and use Firefox as my main browser. So far I haven’t felt anything being imposed on me, political or else by my use of this software. Rather It gives me a great deal of freedom to turn and twist it to my liking. If you know another browser in the market with this level of freedom for their users please let us know.
At the end, Firefox did not politicize this thread, we are doing it. Something I would stop doing …now!
10 Likes
I have considered other browsers, but Firefox multi-containers always keeps me on Firefox and now I really won’t have any reason to look elsewhere https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/mozilla-vpn/multi-account-containers-add-on-on-mozilla-vpn/
3 Likes
+1. This is the feature that nobody else has.
2 Likes
Hmmm. Don’t you guys use FPI or dFPI at all? Or why use containers still? Because that would be redundant when using FPI or dFPI.
I haven’t tried FPI because I have temporary containers.
That being said, how does FPI handle exceptions? What do you do when you have to allow data to be passed between domains. I hit this situation fairly often.
Another exception I have is when I occasionally don’t want data to be allowed within the same domain. For example, I don’t want data be passed between bob.monkey.com and fred.monkey.com.
1 Like
FPI handles every domain (sub domains count too) separately in “containers”. dFPI is the newer version of FPI and is mostly recommended to use nowadays.
The only reason to use Firefox containers is actually, if you want to log in on a website with multiple different accounts. That’s what its good for still. You can not do that with FPI or dFPI. I mean you can use containers with FPI/dFPI, its not bad to use or whatever. It works. Just my personal opinion that it is kinda redundant, if you do not wish to login with different accounts on the same site/domain.
But about privacy Browser, Librewolf is good, if you do not want to harden Firefox yourself.
Here some info about dFPI: https://librewolf.net/docs/faq/#why-isnt-first-party-isolate-enabled-by-default
Temp container extension without ridiculous permissions like “access your data for all websites” etc.
But how does it handle exceptions where a site won’t function without allowing data to traverse to another site? With containers, I can create rules that allow these exceptions. How can you do that with FPI?