for the brave ones: I’ve added a -git version to the AUR 
4 Likes
Thanks, I’ll try that too.
As someone who prefers to use Guake for my system maintenance, I approve of this message
be brave and you’ll have it 
testers welcome
3 Likes
add aarch64 and I’ll become a tester https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=pacseek-git#n8
3 Likes
This would’ve been a better way to go but it works
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=pacseek#n7
hmm, why?
any means that the binary would work on any architecture regardless of where it is compiled on. Is that true in this case?
I don’ know about go but C or C++ are architecture dependent
I’d guess that it could be compiled on a lot more architectures than those two.
Do I know for sure → No.
Let them RISC-V users try. We’ll see.
Here’s a thought, can pacseek include the AUR?
From the first post in this thread:
From the pacseek github page:
pacseek is terminal user interface which allows you to browse and search through the Arch Linux package databases as well as the Arch User Repository
4 Likes
such a beautiful application! thx
but only available in Aur, wich I try to avoid. Any chance that pacseek comes in the Arch community repo, or the eos repo?
1 Like
pacseek is in the Chaotic-AUR repo, which is automated builds of AUR packages. This may not meet your criterion of avoiding the AUR, however…
1 Like
Kent opines positively about pacseek. Wants to port it to debian/apt.
3 Likes
aptseek 
debseek
2 Likes
Hey pacseekers,
v1.7.5 is out with a feature that could be interesting for @khagaroth @npaladin2000
Besides that: Bugfixes
12 Likes
Will a flatpak integration be possible?
Not really. Such kind of software is usually not getting into the repos (see yay/paru)
Anyways, feel free to vote for it
I don’t have any plans for that currently.
2 Likes
dnfseek
1 Like