No, I just meant the header or any other identifying information.
For all we know the example is itself a scam site. Could be anything.
I dunno.
I just know I dont follow the logical steps above to end up at the conclusion “I’m against fact-checkers now”. I even gave equal examples including a real-world one of a fake bomb detecting kit. If we do follow the logic above we should never use any bomb detectors because a fake one once existed. Call it whatever you want. I think thats a bit silly.