Well, after reading more…I got the AMD, with reading that the CPU is much more powerful than the Intel one and it can handle transcoding w/o a problem…so I backtracked on that initial thought.
I guess I’ll be an all AMD house again. I asked a friend on a trip timing and realized I’ve been running that mini-pc for 7 or 8 years, it’s probably time it gets put out to pasture.
Apparently transcoding would be better on the intel, there’s links with videos about it on this thread and comments in that regard on different thread on reddit. But, hey, idw ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Where did you get yours from ? (do you live in the US?)
It’d be so nice if you could report your experience once you’re set up 
Cheers !
Yes (and that’s why I originally favored the Intel), but I decided with it being just me (no family), I typically don’t use it enough to make much difference as long as it can handle it the occassional load (heat being the enemy of electronics to some extent). The extra cpu could do other things (thus the AMD).
I ordered the server from Amazon, because other places didn’t seem to have anything in stock but the no RAM/no SSD models and the prices were identical.
I ordered the drives from NewEgg as the best pricing seemed to be there.
I’d be happy to report back perhaps in late February when I’ve had time to install it, migrate the drives, and see what it can do.
1 Like
Golly gee, Newegg is on top of it, the drives package is already picked up and in UPS possession. Too bad I can’t play with it till the server arrives (est mid Feb), though Amazon often updates dates to quicker.
1 Like
Yes it’s about 37% more powerful. From what i have read on it.
That’s quite a bit of potential there (37%)!
Appreciated!
I’ll probably end up getting something similar (if not exactly similar 
), I arrived at the same conclusions regarding the CPU.
Overall I think this ain’t a bad deal if you weight dollars / consumption / horse power
For a NAS usage exclusively it is probably overkill in terms of specs, but if you compare to any “turnkey” setup on the market it’s a fraction of the price and you don’t end up stuck with proprietary software.
And of course if you want more than a NAS, the question doesn’t even arise…
Yeah, while storage is the main thing…I want it to work for me…and this will certainly give me more CPU/RAM to explore new things. Who knows, maybe I can do something to tie into house automation.
I think it would be (much?) more than that in multithreading
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/5157vs4788/Intel-N100-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-5825U
Well, it’s just benchmarks I guess, but still, 8 cores 16 threads vs 4 core 4 threads, and 3 times the clock speed, you would expect it.
More consumption of course, but still very low, and not even sure there’s that much of a difference when running the whole system.
Anyway, if the price is cheaper and if it’s not to run 50 VMs at the same time, I assume the N100 is perfect.
Yes it was referring to single thread scores.
1 Like