Browsers benchmark

Speedometer 3.1

Machine

$ inxi -SCMz
System:
  Kernel: 6.16.2-arch1-1 arch: x86_64 bits: 64
  Desktop: Cinnamon v: 6.4.10 Distro: EndeavourOS
Machine:
  Type: Laptop System: LENOVO product: 20S0000JGE v: ThinkPad T14 Gen 1
    serial: <superuser required>
  Mobo: LENOVO model: 20S0000JGE v: SDK0J40697 WIN
    serial: <superuser required> UEFI: LENOVO v: N2XET43W (1.33 )
    date: 02/10/2025
CPU:
  Info: quad core model: Intel Core i5-10210U bits: 64 type: MT MCP cache:
    L2: 1024 KiB
  Speed (MHz): avg: 800 min/max: 400/4200 cores: 1: 800 2: 800 3: 800 4: 800
    5: 800 6: 800 7: 800 8: 800

Results

Browser Energy saving Balanced Performance
Firefox 142.0, with extensions, 14 tabs open 2.39 8.75 9.74
Chromium 139.0.7258.66, naked + uBlock Origin 4.40 13.1 14.7
Tor Browser 14.5.6, naked 1.90 6.86 7.82

We can see the performance governor does its work, and that it much depends on the number of extensions and tabs you have active.

But what does this tool actually measure? FPS? Instructions/ns? Attoparsec/microfortnight?

No mention of that on the website, not even if a low or high number is better!

1 Like

Same, FF is loosing quality :anguished_face:

Telemetry is getting heavy

Tests the speed with which you change tabs and the responsiveness of the browser.

Those who finish the test first score higher, but I agree that there could be more information

2 Likes

don’t test it. the winky meant you shouldn’t test it. It’s a lock-down, slow browser good for certain things like reading news.

In AUR I only choose the -bins. never the whole enchilada or the gits.

1 Like

Reminder: you can’t post one screenshot and say it’s a browser benchmark. It’s a device benchmark then. My friendly reminder is that you test and compare multiple browsers on one device, possibly standardising their settings. Even a number of tabs working in the background can influence the result, so you open just one tab for a test.

I’ve done dozens of dozens of tests. My experience always was Blink based browsers were faster than Gecko browsers, so I finally dropped Firefox based, after I’ve discovered… Helium for PC and Cromite for Android as the simplest and cleanest browsers ever. Only Vivaldi, Brave, DuckDuckGo results were close to them while Firefox based were 2x slower… Anyway Vivaldi and especially Brave are too bloated and my trust for DDG is limited.

1 Like

I was thinking about this topic recently, as I’ve been developing a benchmark for a number of frameworks I use, or that I’m interested in. I wasn’t expecting such a huge performance difference between Gecko (Librewolf in this case) and Chromium (Brave in this case).

At a rate of 60fps, the benchmark spawns 16 animated zombie sprites to the stage per tick (per frame), and will continue doing so until the average frame rate drops below 55fps. More zombies means it was better able to handle that load.

And Chromium performed between 2 to 5 times faster!

1 Like

I understand this.

We get canny with things.

I could never do this. You can make any FF-based browser 10X more secure/hardened than a Chrome/Chromium-based browser.

That said speed is the benchmark being discussed, not security, so I apologize.

My dedicated work browser has to be Chrome-based because, let’s admit it, life is easier this way. I stopped my long love affair with Ungoogled Chromium. We get canny. It’s lost a step or I have. I spent one week with Helium (and Thorium) two weeks ago, didn’t feel it had a speed advantage and I didn’t like they stripped out all password storing stuff. I understand it, but I didn’t like it since it’s a work-only browser…

…but I found this chromium underdog in the AUR called Trivalent. Fast as hell, secure, and I love it.

What’s my point? Benchmark speeds don’t lie…but as to our tastes, do we lie to ourselves? Or do instincts work on another level? (rhetorical).

interesting, you feeling this way going into it, but results I kinda expected–not that wide of a chasm though..

I’ve been 10 happy years linux/foss but even in WIN from a younger age you just knew, always, that Firefox was a beat (a millisecond?) behind Chrome. Always noticeable on some level. I’m afraid to ask what the Zombie measurement system is :slight_smile: ?

1 Like

Brrraaaaains…
Screencast_20260330_131530

It was just a readily available asset :wink:


Edit: Removed, was straying off-topic.

1 Like