Anyone using thunderbird from aur?

You probably want to do neither of things and use profile manager to choose your existing profile.

Yeah, that’s one of the very few things that piss me off about Arch: the rules for the AUR package submission are very vague and seem to be selectively (or at least, inconsistently) enforced.

But given the overall state of the world, it’s only a minor gripe at the moment… :rofl:

1 Like

I’ve been using it with only a couple minor most likely mostly my fault issues at the beginning. For one it didn’t want to launch through the menu, once I launched it from the terminal, the menu worked fine, so I’m guessing some kind of desktop file problem. The second was that it lost all my accounts and settings, but since I use IMAP, it wasn’t like I lost anything I couldn’t replace.

Sounds like it started with a new profile. If you ever have that again, try thunderbird -P to show the profile screen.

The thunderbird site, on the download page, says this:

Thunderbird version 102.0 is only offered as direct download from thunderbird.net and not as an upgrade from Thunderbird version 91 or earlier. A future release will provide updates from earlier versions.

I don’t think migrations work yet from 91. I’d bet that this is holding up the package and all it’s language versions from appearing in the Arch extra repo.

1 Like

Using it and loving it. No problems.

Migrations work.
But: I always use the Profile-Manager because I have my private and a work profile, that’s why I didn’t have to select the right profile with thunderbird -P - it’s the default for me.
Edited the post above to reflect that.

I think what they mean with that is: The internal update mechanism of thunderbird does not offer an update to 102 yet.

(btw. The internal updater is only available when downloading thunderbird directly from mozilla. If it’s packaged by a distro, this option is usually removed…)

So far so good here, using thunderbird 102 but unfornatelly i seem to have this same issue too:

never mind, thunderbird got an update now and birdtray seems to be working fine, apparently i didn’t have thunderbird running that’s why i wasn’t getting notifications

Looks like birdtray got a PR merged to fix the unread-count issue, i believe i should switch to birdtray-git aur package to get these update change ?

There is major jump in TB from 90something to 102. Old profiles won’t work as is without some intervention, I guess. At least not in some distros (afaik, Fedora excluded).

OT, but no, I am no longer using Thunderbird since I gave Betterbird a try. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages?O=0&K=betterbird-bin

Same here :slight_smile:
More about BB here: https://www.betterbird.eu/

1 Like

Since we are slightly OT :grinning:
The BB dev fixed what Thunderbird wouldn’t

Do you get notifications with better bird closed ?

No. but I keep BB open all the time.
Being ā€œclosedā€ is not the same as minimized.

BTW you can dock any application to system tray using KDocker.
In this particular case docking BB to system tray is useful for me :slight_smile:

i switched to betterbird too, but sometimes (ex right now) it takes several minutes to load and send e-mails, this issue goes back and forth every once in a while

Thanks for the suggestion…

Just checked out BB and compared to TB … frankly, I can’t see a meaningful difference in my use case - with the exception of the multi-line message register. Not sure that’s a compelling need for me personally.

In the past I’ve tried to find a workable TUI email app. Mutt (with the benefit of mutt-wizard for install/config) seemed like a real contender … but the ability to easily read incoming HTML content in emails without having to open a separate browser became a real pain. Disrupted my email workflow routinely. Perhaps I just didn’t configure things properly within wmi3 tiling environment.

So, I seem to be stuck with TB for the time being. :roll_eyes: