So…What’s better for Arch TTY on nvidia driver from Ubuntu, Gnome or systemd?
3 Likes
I would have put this at #1. I see this and my innards begin to feel like a volcano who woke up and said, “today is the day I spew hot lava like a cracked teapot!” 
3 Likes
I intentionally saved the best one for last 
3 Likes
Isn’t that Gnome?
Perhaps if it would run on condensed milk rather than soymilk?
3 Likes
I don’t see any questions in the link you shared. 
1 Like
No, that is only the answer, I guess.
1 Like
Gnome is definitely the best environment for tablets. Not so much for desktops though.
1 Like
That question was not a question!
What It run since v.3.00 on my desktop every release being better than the last.
Ah. Nevermind then. Gnome it is?
1 Like
Gnome? I hate that applications menu thing that pops up with like 20 icons on it across the whole screen. That’s it for me, I see that and I just can’t do it anymore.
Yes its a bit Mac ish, i use a proper menu on Gnome.
In fact mine is so customized its hard to tell its gnome at times.
Alright fellow off topic folks. Let’s see if we can steer this Titanic away from the off topic iceberg.
1 Like
Well i’m a Arch installed the Arch way 
user and you are happy to talk about me so lets talk non Arch users, Oh i forgot Arch users get banned for that sort of shenanigans it against forum rules. Lol
1 Like
It’s a pub 
This is where that happens. Try not to offend anyone.
2 Likes
Small crowd EndeavourOS is not the Arch way
3 Likes
When made up percentages matter, Arch is only 0.01 away. . .
Matter of fact I think this just became profile worthy.
I’m quite proud of the fact that all my installs of Arch distro’s were done NOT the Arch way. Why waste 45 minutes when I can take 10? The Arch way is inefficient.
Really how long to download the ISO then Install then update does not Equal 10 mins.Arch takes 15 mins using any old ISO and is fully upto date after install Your way is the inefficient way.