NAILED IT
Reclaim your privacy with Simple Phone
We believe the next giant leap in consumer phones is a leap back. Letās go back to simpler times when phones had no spyware and adware.
Est. reading time: 19 minutes
NAILED IT
For example:
AhHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
Thatās a fair statement.
Pixel 7 comes with a cough and snort detection feature. I wonder if TeslaPhone would have this as well. Would be a dealbreaker for me otherwise.
An easy task for you - click on all the hyperlinks in the article that link to a range of different sources that are not owned by Axel Springer.
An easy task for meā¦
HONK-HONK!!!111
Not as easy by far! Not even a fart close!
Then rest easy in the comfort of your prejudices.
@everyone Goodnight all
a range of different sources that are not owned by Axel Springer
On how many heads are the American corporate news media distributed? Escapes me. Was it two, or three of them billionaires? Sorry, I forgot.
Donāt forget to ask yourself, who owns these.
And yes, the number of the beast (666) on top of the list just seems casually unintendedā¦
Do you know anything of Axel Springer?
Yes.
You could also have linked to this other article at Foreign Policy. Of course, FP is owned by The Slate Group corporation, so should I trust this particular American corporate news media?
I live in a country where in every Europe wide survey in recent years trust in its newspapers has received the lowest or near lowest country score. One of these newspapers has the most visited English-language newspaper website, and Wikipedia has determined that it is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited.
I am very used to reading news articles from corporate media with a high degree of scepticism, and searching for additional information to verify any claims made in such articles.
Let me give you an example of my approach. Someone on the internet has posted a graphic that purports to show a high concentration of media ownership. The graphic does not include Axel Springer SE which they had earlier cited as an example of corporate media not to be trusted, and they also wibble on about the number of the beast. Not the most promising material, I think youāll agree
But examining the graphic closely I spot a reference to a āfull list of sourcesā and a website link. Of course, this is not a link you can just click on, but one you have to type yourself into your address bar. Given that some people are too lazy to click on links, this isnāt too promising either
Going to the website http://bit.ly/WhoOwnsNews opens a Google Sheet which is a table with details of media companies and the newspapers/websites they own. A lot of the information in the table is already known to me, and links to sources of the information are also included. The links are not clickable, so that would exclude lazy people but copying and pasting them into a browser tab opens them, and the information on these websites backs up the information in the spreadsheet. Finally, I cross reference some of the individual and company names with the spreadsheet. While I havenāt checked every piece of information, Iām satisfied that the graphic is accurate, despite its dodgy source
The reason I chose to link to this article was that despite my ever-present scepticism about the corporate owner of the website, it provided a good summary of information Iād already seen (and in some cases previously verified to my satisfaction), and, most importantly, backed up its reporting with links to a wide range of other sources, including primary sources.
I must have missed that.
I wonder why
Thanks, buddie!
Not meaning to engage in further āpoliticalsā here, I agree with most of what you wrote. Letās just leave it at that. (If not there wonāt be an end to this discussion, I surmise.)
I just learned about a new privacy respecting phone:
We believe the next giant leap in consumer phones is a leap back. Letās go back to simpler times when phones had no spyware and adware.
Est. reading time: 19 minutes
We have enough phones. I donāt care for Tesla canāt stand Twitter and Elon Musk is not a genius. He has a lot of smart people working for his companies. He himself is just a mouthpiece. Tired of hearing about freedom of speech garbage. Everyone has the ability to think what ever they want. No one else needs to be subjected to their views & opinions because they think they have the right to tell everyone. Twitter can go away as well as Facebook for all i care. Tesla Phone ā¦ no thanks. I canāt stand social media platforms and this is not what i want in the internet, computer or phone. Iād rather Endeavour!
Iād rather Endeavour!
Me too, so Google and Youtube may go to hell, just as well (FB, Twitter, Telegram and the like, of course)!
No. Wait a minuteā¦ I forgot Amazon, Netflix, and Steam. Yes!
And while weāre at it. Microsoft. Intel. Of courseā¦ you get the idea.
Now youāre just being silly.
You accuse me? Why do you think I could mirror your āsillyā remark for lack of a better word? - Not meaning to accuse youā¦
Twitter can go away
But how about Twitter 2.0, Eveything App?
Imagine a TeslaPhone with an Everything App! Whatās not to like?
Hopefully it will have a full āSelf-Drivingā feature enabled by default.
I would gladly let my life to be steered remotely according to the decrees of The Sire
After all, the future of the civilization is at stake here!